The question of why Iran sees Israel as an enemy extends far beyond conventional geopolitics. While territorial disputes and regional influence often dominate headlines, the underlying causes are deeply rooted in religious ideology, revolutionary principles, and historical grievances.
For Tehran, Israel is not simply a neighboring state or political adversary—it is viewed as a spiritual and existential obstacle to Iran’s vision of regional justice.
The Iranian leadership frames Israel as a symbol of Western influence, Zionist power, and moral corruption in the Middle East. Understanding this perspective requires analyzing the intersection of faith, ideology, and strategy that drives Tehran’s actions, shaping the modern Iran Israel conflict.
Table of Contents
1. Ideological Foundations of Iran’s Hostility
Since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, Iran has positioned opposition to Israel as a cornerstone of its political and ideological identity. Ruhollah Khomeini established a framework in which Israel is seen as an agent of Western imperialism, challenging both Islamic values and Iran’s sovereignty.
Iran’s revolutionary ideology portrays the struggle against Israel as a moral and spiritual duty, not merely a geopolitical calculation. Ali Khamenei has reinforced this narrative through speeches emphasizing Israel as a barrier to divine justice, framing the confrontation as a civilizational struggle rather than a conventional military rivalry.
2. Religious Doctrine and Eschatological Beliefs
A critical factor in why Iran sees Israel as an enemy lies in the Shia concept of Mahdism. According to this belief, Imam al-Mahdi, the awaited savior, will appear to establish justice during a period of global oppression. Within this eschatological framework, Israel is perceived as part of the forces opposing divine order.
This belief system influences Iran’s foreign policy and military strategy, motivating support for proxies such as Hamas and Hezbollah. Military campaigns, drone operations, and missile deployments are thus framed as extensions of a spiritual mission, rather than purely tactical maneuvers.
3. Proxy Warfare Across the Region
Iran’s ideological opposition to Israel manifests through multi-front proxy warfare. In Gaza, southern Lebanon, and Syria, Iranian-backed groups continuously challenge Israeli security, conducting missile strikes, drone attacks, and intelligence operations.
These efforts create a persistent security threat, forcing Israel to maintain heightened defense readiness, including the deployment of the Iron Dome and preemptive airstrikes. This strategy allows Iran to exert influence while minimizing direct confrontation, demonstrating the strategic sophistication underpinning its ideological stance.
4. Political Consequences of the Iran-Israel Rivalry
The Iran Israel conflict is inseparable from domestic and regional politics. For Tehran, maintaining hostility toward Israel consolidates revolutionary legitimacy, rallies domestic support, and reinforces alliances with other anti-Israel actors in the Middle East.
For Israel, the existential nature of the threat shapes foreign policy and military planning. The presence of Iranian-backed militias, combined with advanced missile and drone technology, ensures that the rivalry remains a central factor in regional stability and international diplomatic calculations.
5. Key Statements from Leadership
- Ali Khamenei: Frames Israel as a “spiritual obstacle” to regional justice, emphasizing religious duty in opposition.
- Israeli officials: Highlight existential threats posed by Iranian proxies, reinforcing preemptive military measures.
- Analysts: Note that Iran’s eschatological beliefs reinforce patience, long-term strategic planning, and ideological persistence in the conflict.
6. Strategic and Geopolitical Significance
The question of why Iran sees Israel as an enemy carries long-term geopolitical implications. Iran’s ideological framework ensures that the conflict is not a temporary dispute, but a persistent faith-driven confrontation. Israel’s preemptive strategies and defense posture, in turn, reflect the existential urgency it attaches to Iranian threats.
The rivalry shapes alliances across the Middle East, influences energy security, and impacts global political alignments. From the Gulf to Europe, policymakers monitor Iran’s ideological motivations as closely as its military capabilities.
7. FAQ: Understanding the Iran-Israel Conflict
Q1: Why Iran sees Israel as an enemy?
A1: Iran perceives Israel as a spiritual, ideological, and existential adversary. Revolutionary principles, Shia eschatology, and opposition to Western influence drive this stance.
Q2: How does religion influence Iran’s foreign policy?
A2: Shia doctrines, including belief in Imam al-Mahdi, guide both diplomatic and military strategy, framing Israel as part of a cosmic struggle.
Q3: What role do proxies play in this conflict?
A3: Groups like Hamas and Hezbollah allow Iran to conduct multi-front operations against Israel while maintaining ideological and strategic influence.
Q4: Could the conflict escalate beyond the region?
A4: Yes. Ideology-driven military actions, combined with regional alliances, make escalation a risk with potential global consequences.
Q5: How does Israel respond to Iran’s ideological approach?
A5: Israel uses preemptive strikes, missile defense systems, and intelligence operations to counter perceived existential threats.
Conclusion: The Enduring Struggle
Understanding why Iran sees Israel as an enemy requires examining the intersection of ideology, religion, and strategy. For Iran, Israel is more than a political rival—it embodies a spiritual and ideological challenge that shapes the nation’s foreign policy, military doctrine, and regional ambitions.
For Israel, the stakes are existential, prompting vigilance, preemptive action, and strategic innovation. This conflict, rooted in faith and ideology, will likely define Middle Eastern geopolitics for decades to come.
Visit www.documentarytimes.com for more in-depth coverage and expert analysis.